Background
1.
About 60% of population living in villages.
2.
Prior to the encroachment by the British, these were
self-sufficient.
3.
Community Development Program started in 1952 with
the block development approach.
4.
This was followed by the National Extension Scheme
(NES) which covered all the blocks.
5.
This approach did not do well as it failed to garner
public support and participation.
1954, Balwant Rai
Committee
1.
Democratic Decentralization
2.
3-tier PRIs.
3.
Post this, in 1959 1st PRI in Naguar
District, Rajasthan.
Phases of PRIs
1.
Phase of ascendency 1959-65;
2.
Phase of stagnation 1965-69;
3.
Phase of decline 1969-83;
4.
Phase of revival 1983-present.
1978, Ashok Mehta
Committee
1.
Pointed out reason of decline of PRIs – caste considerations;
corruption; financial dependency; political interference; power concentration
etc;
2.
2-tier system;
3.
Nyaya Panchayat;
4.
Participation by Political parties;
5.
State govt. to have a Panchayati Raj Ministry;
6.
Local revenue generation.
LM Singhvi
Committee
1.
Constitutional Status to PRIs;
2.
Gram Sabha and Nyaya panchayat to be the corner
stone.
3.
As a result, we saw the 73rd A Act
inserting the 11th schedule.
Gram sabha
1.
All adult electorates.
2.
Quorum is 1/10th
3.
Generally meets once or twice a year.
4.
Selection of schemes and beneficiaries.
5.
Budget and other official documents.
6.
In some states like Rajasthan, all residents are
members.
7.
Social Audit.
Panchayat Samiti
1.
This is at the Block level.
2.
Members include MPs, MLAs, SDO, Sarpanch, BDO.
3.
BDO also responsible for work of extension officers
and the Village Level Workers (VLWs)
Zila Parishad
1.
This is apex body of the PRI hierarchy.
2.
In some state like TN and AP, DM is the chair.
3.
In some states Dist. Development Commissioner is the
chair.
Timeline of
Important Schemes/Programs
1.
Intensive Agricultural Area Program prior to the
Green Revolution.
2.
Drought Prone Area Program (1973);
3.
Area Development Approach;
4.
Command Area Development program.
5.
Desert Development Program (77-78);
6.
Integrated Rural Development Program;
No comments:
Post a Comment