Sunday, May 10, 2015

[UPSC Interview prep feed Vol.20] Success Stories from North-East : Mizoram and Tripura

 Topic Discussed: Success Stories from North-East : Mizoram and Tripura
 The author of this post wishes to remain anonymous.

Mizoram

         It is interesting to note that Mizo society, at the time of independence, was perhaps one of the most progressive ones in North-East and an organisation by the name of Mizo Union was formed to end the rule of tribal chief, establishing democratic village society and joining the Union of India. Post- independence,Mizoram continued to be administered as “Lushai Hills” District within the state of Assam and there was considerable discontent due to Assamese domination. The breaking point came in the year 1959, when it faced cyclical “Mautam” famine. Mautam occurs cyclically after about 48 years and is accompanied by flowering of wild bamboo which leads to increase in rat population,famine and plague. The 1959 mautam,apart from causing increase in rat population, famine and plague, also caused emergence of Mizo insurgency. The actions of Government at that time turned out to be insufficient in dealing with the problem. It was during this period that  Mizo National Famine Front(MNFF) was established with an aim to provide famine relief  but transformed later(in 1962) to Mizo National Front(MNF), a secessionist movement. The opportunity was exploited by Pakistan, which provided arms and shelter to the insurgents through the then East Pakistan.

        In the year 1966, MNF declared independence and carried out terrorist attacks against Government and other institutions through “Operation Jericho”. For eight days even the capital Aizawl was under control of MNF.  The situation deteriorated to the extent that Indian Air Force was called in and this is the only case in the history of independent India that Air Force was used in case of an internal disorder. Although the Pakistan, China aided “Operation Jericho” was a failure, yet the insurgents continued to survive due to support and shelter they received through the then East Pakistan. It is unfortunate that the government carried out relocation program for many Mizo villages with an attempt to weaken MNF. This British and American style relocation and segregation was opposed by locals and fortunately the government realised the futility of such relocations and the plan was abandoned. Within MNF, divisions became apparent as one group favoured negotiations while the other,favoured by Pakistan, pushed for violent actions. The 1971 war gave delivered a deadly blow to MNF.

        The Government took commendable a step towards reconciliation by separating Mizoram from Assam as a separate Union Territory in 1972. This step restored much of the lost confidence towards Mizo Union,which considerably lost popularity after the mautam famine and emergence of MNF, and the Government. However, some factions within MNF continued insurgency with help from China. Finally, MNF leaders realised futility of their insurgency which was causing undue hardships to the population and MNF's support base had drastically reduced in this period. In 1976, MNF leader Laldenga agreed for negotiations within the contours of the Indian constitution implying acceptance of Mizoram as a part of India.   

        However, some factions of MNF with  support from China continued insurgency. The discontent amongst certain sections of Mizos due to illegal migration from Bangladesh gave them a support base. Negotiations were not moving a positive direction and some factions MNF used ceasefire periods as breathing period for strengthening themselves and carrying out extortions. Finally in 1982, Government banned MNF and launched crackdown. The crackdown and Police action forced MNF to return back to negotiations, Government also took a step further by considering the demand of full statehood and carried out fencing of Bangladesh border to reduce illegal immigration. After multiple rounds of negotiations, finally an agreement was reached in 1986 with MNF wherein Full statehood was granted to Mizoram and MNF agreed to accept Indian Constitution.

        Since then, Mizoram is largely peaceful and shown tremendous progress in various socio-economic indicators, like literacy rate of more than 91% and Sherchhip and Aizawl becoming two most literate districts in India.

        Despite being a success story Mizoram is still not completely free of ethnic tensions. In 1997, more than 5,000 tribal  Bru families had to escape to Tripura and other parts. About 35,000 refugees are still living in refugee camps of Tripura. If Mizoram is to continue its success story then it needs peaceful settlement of Bru issue , otherwise another insurgency is perhaps waiting to emerge.

In opinion of the author, the following factors helped in achieving success in Mizoram:-

·         When it appeared that ceasefires and negotiations are being misused by MNF for strengthening itself,extortion,carrying out violence,etc. The response of government was crackdown,unlike in case of NSCN(IM) which is misusing negotiations and ceasefires since 1996 for carrying out criminal activities,extortion,blocking NH 39 to Manipur,drug trafficking,gun running. Sometimes crackdown against insurgent groups is a necessary evil.

·         Unlike Naga insurgent groups,which are plenty in numbers and factions,there was a greater degree of cohesion in Mizo insurgent groups (MNF being the primary). Thus, negotiation and settlement with one group was quite effective whereas in case of Nagas it is difficult to accommodate all conflicting groups simultaneously.

·         There is greater cohesion amongst Mizo tribes when compared with Nagas, who have at least 17 major tribes and many are in serious conflict with each other.
 
·         Most of top leaders of MNF were from the state of Mizoram or Lushai Hills district and hence the demand for “Greater Mizoram” was negotiable whereas in case of Naga groups top leadership is mostly from areas outside Nagaland state and hence their demand for “Greater Nagaland”/”Nagaland” is more persisting. Such demand is difficult to meet considering opposition from Manipur,Assam and Arunachal Pradesh. 
       
Tripura    

                Tripura, a former princely state, joined Indian Union by signing Instrument of Accession by the then Regent Queen who was governing on behalf of her minor son. Not many are aware that during the time of independence, a section of palace nobles,led by Durjoy Karta, entered into conspiracy with a local pro-Muslim League Party to make Tripura join Pakistan. But the conspiracy was foiled by popular sentiment in favour of joining Indian Union.

                Partition of India was accompanied by large-scale migration of Bengalis from the then East Pakistan to Tripura. Further, Tripura became more isolated from rest of the country as direct link to Calcutta was lost due to formation of East Pakistan  and the other way is through the narrow “chicken neck corridor”. The tribals of Tripura became a minority to due large-scale migration from East Pakistan and other parts of the country. Further, the end of monarchy and establishment of democracy, reduced political power of native tribals who were now a minority. There was  a feeling of discontent and neglect amongst the tribals. Organisations like “Tripura Upajati Juba Samiti” (TUJS) , “Tripura National Volunteers” (TNV) , “National Liberation Front of Tripura”(NLFT) were formed in 1971,1981 and 1989 respectively. These organisations claimed to represent interests of Tribals and demanded restoration of Tribal lands,deportation of what they called “illegal migrants” and even secession. It is unfortunate that successive Governments of Tripura formed during initial few decades after independence were not so sensitive to concerns to tribals and failed to carry out land reforms. These organisations took advantage of grievances of tribals to gain their support and porous border with Bangladesh helped them. Although these groups remained largely ineffective initially, but from about mid-1990s these groups got support from elements across the border in Bangladesh and violence increased considerably. In 1999, United Bengal Liberation Front was formed, which carried out counter-attacks on tribals and claimed to protect Bengalis from NLFT. This created a vicious cycle of attacks and counter-attacks.

        However, the Tripura launched an effective counter-insurgency strategy which involved:-
·         The counter-insurgency operations were mostly carried out by Central Armed Police Forces(CAPF) and State Police, unlike in other states where Army plays a significant role. This minimised any unintended losses to civilian population as CAPFs and State Police is better for low-intensity internal conflicts unlike army which is mostly trained for war-like situations.
·         Involvement of tribals as special police officers. Their knowledge of local train and social networks helped in gathering intelligence.
·         Actions of CAPF and State Police were closely monitored to minimise any chances of excesses and rights violation.
·         Governance in areas cleared by security forces were strengthened without much delay creating a positive image of the state by creation of health centres,schools,etc.(This is in sharp contrast to Saranda where area liberated from naxalites remained the same or even became worse)
·         Information campaign was launched by the Government exposing hypocrisy of Militant leadership which led a luxurious life and exploited lower ranks.
·         Village level grassroot democracy was strenghtened.

The result was that Tripura not only overcame insurgency but is a Model State of North-East India. Between 2004-05 and 2009-10 %age of BPL population reduced from 40% to 17.4 %. This is highly commendable considering that poverty rates increased in all North-Eastern states,except Tripura and Arunachal Pradesh,  during this period. As per its own survey, Tripura has even left behind Kerala in literacy by achieving 94.65 per cent rate beating Kerala's 93.91 per cent(although this is not as per 2011 census data but a subsequent survey reported  in Tripura in 2013,http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/home/education/news/Tripura-beats-Kerala-in-literacy/articleshow/22416019.cms

No comments: