Saturday, January 11, 2014

Book Review: Himalayan Blunder * * *

About the author
         Brigadier J.P.Dalvi was born in Basra (Iraq)on 3rd July 1920 where his father was serving with the British Administration. In 1929, he came to India and completed his school and college education in Bombay. At the outbreak of the 2nd World War, he quit his education and decided to join the Army. In January 1962 he volunteered to command 7 Infantry Brigade in the North-east Frontier Agency Sector of Towang. He was captured by the Chinese Forces on 22nd October and repatriated in May 1963. It was in their custody that he formed the general outline of the book that would tell the real story of the biggest blunder in Indian military history.


Synopsis
         It is not just another book on the corner, it is rather a memoir. A memoir starting in the decade preceding the India-China was in the year 1962.  Dalvi starts with building the premise way before the actual occurrence of the war as the real reasons lay in the historical buildup to the war. Firstly, he discusses the Indian role in the Tibet region and how those historical dealings between the governments of British India and Tibet would lead to disastrous repercussions in the coming decades. Secondly, Dalvi talks in detail about the fibers of Indian Foreign Policy  in the Nehruvian era and how it had a deep impact on the equations of the possible war. Then he describes the half-hearted preparations for the war by the Indian side. Further he describes the war scene in grave detail and how Chinese perceived the Indian side.

Part wise analysis

Part1: The years of credulity and negligence

        This being the genesis of the political plot of the war he goes to the historic origins of the story and details the role of British India in the dealings with Tibet which did not go very well with China. He supports his analysis by the words of India’s distinguished President, Dr. S. Radhakrishnan when he exclaimed, “We have been negligent and credulous”. He talks about the uneasy lull during the first half of the decade of 1950s and how casually Indian Government took the Chinese incursions in those times. He talks about the half-hearted preparations of the army and the fact that in terms of capacity and military might we had already lost the war to China.

Part2:The fateful year 1962

         Here he talks of the wishful thinking of the political bosses and the armchair assumption that the Chinese would never attack. Nehru was of the firm belief  that the Chinese would totally respect the principles of Panchsheel. Here he describes the disastrous “Forward Policy” or the Operation Onkar which gave the Chinese a reason to attack.

Part3: On to the Namka Chu

         Here he neatly describes the pre-war setting and the burgeoning of both forces on either side of the river. The description here is so lively that you actually feel while reading that you are in fact roaming in the battle field and witnessing the preparations for real. Here the author critically discusses the Operation or intention of Indian government to “evict the Chinese from the Indian territories.

Part4: The end of make believe

         Here the author describes the homecoming of our political brass who where on international diplomatic mission at the time of the Chinese incursions. He takes a critical dig at the decisions and pre-occupations of our Prime Minister in those fateful times. He emotionally describes the war-setting chosen by the Indian forces was extremely vulnerable and put the Chinese at a vantage point. He describes the clash at Tseng Jong and the subsequent policy fluctuations on the Indian side.

Part 5: The battle at Namka Chu River

         This part starts with the amended mandate for the forces. Witnessing the Chinese might in the clash at Tseng John, the Indian leadership decides that it would be best to defend the positions rather than mounting an attack on the proven-superior Chinese forces. Here is critically analyzes both the stances and is able to prove to the reader that both where utterly wrong decisions and the right course would have been something else. Moreover, he criticizes the absence of higher leadership at the most crucial time in the war. And lastly he describes the humiliating times when he was a captive of the Chinese Army.

Part6: The reason why

         Moving out from the battlefield, he launches a ruthless and deserving attack on the political leadership of that times. He asserts that the “civil supremacy” cannot be allowed to interfere in matters which are purely strategic and military in nature. Then he compares and contrasts the roles of various Defence Ministers of India in those fateful years.

Critical Evaluation
         Dalvi’s writing is immensely descriptive which makes it more of a memoir than a story.
         His style of presenting pre-analysis and post-analysis helps the reader tremendously to understand the nitty-gritty's of war with ease. Moreover, the various references made by him and the illustrations taken from various works to make the reader understand his own references shows the kind of detailed work that he has undertaken in the making of this wonderful masterpiece. One of the shortcomings though has been the fact that it is conspicuous that the author is not a regular writer and in the process he gives away the gist of the whole event in the early ramblings itself. Also he seem to reassert the same assertions again and again which becomes like tiny road-blocks for the reader. And finally, this brave attempt to tell the truth to the world must be commended eternally.





No comments: